The Canadian Auto Workers union would likely prefer to deal next with Ford instead of Chrysler as it attempts to negotiate a deal for concessions that matches cuts at General Motors.
Ford and Chrysler have already said the concessions in the GM-CAW deal are inadequate.
CAW negotiators yesterday held high-level talks with both companies in an attempt to break the impasse between the ailing automakers, which are demanding more concessions, and the union, which insists Ford and Chrysler must follow the GM "pattern" contract.
CAW president Ken Lewenza said talks recessed for the weekend and the union will likely select one of the companies on Monday in efforts to reach a deal.
Agreement on significant cuts in labour costs is critical for the three money-losing companies if they want to qualify for billions of dollars in financial assistance from the federal and Ontario governments, and stay alive.
Lewenza said there is more pressure for a deal at Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. now because the company’s U.S. workers have ratified a deal with cost savings that puts their Canadian counterparts at a disadvantage.
"We held exploratory talks with Ford that were constructive and we have been also meeting with Chrysler," he said yesterday.
"The deal with the UAW (United Auto Workers) and Ford in the U.S. is putting a little more pressure on getting the job done. The disadvantage of not doing so is obvious."
Lewenza doesn’t think Ford and Chrysler could achieve any significant savings through workplace changes in local plant deals that would be beyond the so-called "master agreement" with GM.
The union, which represents about 9,000 workers at operations in Oakville, Windsor and St. Thomas, has said it will retain its competitive edge over labour costs at Ford in the U.S. so they don’t jeopardize company investments here.
Ford is seeking a standby line of credit of about $2 billion from Ottawa and Queen’s Park. Chrysler is requesting nearly $3 billion.
CAW leaders have historically looked at Ford as more co-operative in reaching contracts under difficult circumstances easy payday loans. But one CAW insider said yesterday the union was running into problems with both companies.
The comment came a day after Joe Hinrichs, group vice-president for global manufacturing at parent Ford Motor Co., said the GM deal would not provide sufficient savings to compete against U.S. rivals.
A day earlier, Chrysler president Tom LaSorda described the GM concessions as "unacceptable" for his company. Chrysler would need more cuts, plus the resolution of a long tax dispute worth hundreds of millions of dollars, otherwise plants here would be at risk, he said.
The GM worker concessions, which are conditional on the company getting loans from the governments, call for wage and pension freezes until 2012, plus higher personal costs for benefits.
The union says the GM concessions will reduce labour costs, including pension obligations, by "several dollars" an hour from the current level of almost $70.
CAW economist Jim Stanford said the latest GM cuts will mean "even more substantial savings" than a deal last year, in which workers accepted changes that would cut labour costs by about $400 million until 2011. Lewenza said the current talks are unusual because there is no strike deadline and workers have a contract for more than two years.
As well, it is unusual for talks to be linked to negotiations between the automakers and the government.
Industry watcher Dennis DesRosiers expressed concern this week that GM did not gain more concessions from production workers who earn about $34 an hour and receive significant benefits.
He said the deal could "blow up" in GM’s face because of public sentiment against taxpayers’ aid. At the same time, he said lack of aid for the automakers would cause thousands of other job losses and "untold damage" to the economy.
Federal Industry Minister Tony Clement said he didn’t want to pass judgment on the GM concessions, but added it was one of many issues that needed resolution before Ottawa invested taxpayers’ money.
Source